Saturday, February 2, 2019

Flattery in Pride and Prejudice Essay example -- Pride and Prejudice

Flattery in presumption and Prejudice Since its composition in 1797, Jane capital of Texass Pride and Prejudice has enjoyed two centuries of literary esteem not because of its witty dialogue or its tantalizing plot, al wholeness because of its universal themes that allow modern readers to identify with early Victorian life. Although the unused focuses on the etiquette of courtship, related social rituals are also prevalent end-to-end the story. William Collins, a rector in Pride and Prejudice, uses excessive adulation to bow people to look upon him favorably. He even lavishly praises himself to enhance his self-esteem. turn the sycophants peculiar behavior is comical at first glance, its emphasis in the story portends a greater social meaning that is illuminated upon valuation of his flattery with relevance to the plot. In Pride and Prejudice, Austin suggests through Collins mannerisms that one flat ters others to enlist their future support and one flatters oneself to ensure individual prosperity. Pertaining to others, Austin endows Collins with a motive of personalised gain and later removes that objective, establishing a strong correlation between flattery and selfish advantage. As the legal heir to the Bennet familys estate once its patriarch dies, Collins offers inexcusable praise along with his hand in marriage to one of the daughters. apart(predicate) from flattering the family to marry one of its girls, his profuse compliments also transmit to his wealthy benefactress and also, of course, to himself. However, Collins compliments toward the family end after he fails to marry on... ...lattery whitethorn have academic influence, she allows Collins to smother praise on anything that cleverness prove advantageous to his affluence, from which one may surmise that flattery contributes to personal pr osperity in any form. This truth becomes readily apparent upon secernate Collins behavior in situations wherein he may or may not have something to gain through flattery. Of course, this mundane reiteration about flattery must be particularly monotonous to a reader who has already demonstrated a profound grasp of literature by deftly maneuvering through and deliberating upon mistakes previous to this point, so it is for that intelligent and sophisticated reader that this typography ends abruptly. Work Cited Austin, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Norwalk The Easton Press, 1997.

No comments:

Post a Comment