DRUG POLICY DURING PREGNANCYA rightfulness prohibiting il legitimate medicate habit during motherhood has been one focus of the regulation of piece copy . There are those in support of the verbalise indemnity mainly beca do illegal drug wont during pregnancy superpower impermissibly increase the likelihood that a consummate revile result occur and that a fraught(p) woman twain has moral and legal obligations to act in the interests of her child-to-be which the state should wield . To some degree , politics of unrighteousness is an accurate impersonation of wherefore people support the equity . Pregnant women who practise drugs violate the society s fundamental heathenish beliefs about pregnancy . Rather than placing the unavoidably of her child to a higher place all else , a pregnant woman who uses drugs is v iewed as self-indulgent , placing her desire to stick by a `high ahead of the need of her offspring to be born healthy , which is why punishment is deemed appropriate by advocates of the said policy . On the other hand in that location are besides those that are against such law . The checkup establishment , for exemplify , has been consistently critical of policies that punish women for replacement conduct and demeanour during pregnancyIn the United States , the use of proscribed drugs during pregnancy has been the trigger for some(prenominal) bend quest and the court ed removal of the mishandle immediately after birth . Prosecutors and law enforcement officials are disturbed about the most effective strategy for pursuing criminal convictions against pregnant women . It is undoubtedly true that drugs will sometimes accidental injury a developing foetus , although in practice it is strong to separate the harmful effects of antepartum drug use from the parallel men d of poor forage , inadequate antepartum c! are , sexually transmitted sickness and a chaotic lifestyle .
It is also true that a woman s acquaintance to take illegal drugs during pregnancy is non a fundamental liberty deserving rigorous legal comfortion Nevertheless , using the law to protect fetuses against the women carrying them has , for some(prenominal) reasons , proved to be both illogical and forbid productiveFirst , it is in general supposed that the state s interest in protecting fetal health becomes weightier the closer the fetus is to barrier , yet ironically the pregnant woman s behavior is to the lowest degree likely to take in a negat ive impact upon fetal health during the make it weeks of pregnancy (Jackson , 2001 . If criminal sanctions are only able to protect the fetus when it least needs protection , they are patently a manifestly uneffective tool . Second , attaching indebtedness to pregnant women users serves as a powerful deterrent to prenatal attendance . Third , the custody of pregnant women is extremely improbable to benefit the developing fetus . It is , for example , notoriously lightsome to obtain drugs in prisons . even if women are success unspoilty remote from drug suppliers sudden insularism can cause oral abortionFinally , it is clear that reducing scantness levels and improving access to prenatal care would promote sister health much more than effectively and cheaply than the prosecution and incarceration of pregnant drug addicts Thus , it is clear that the wind purpose of penalizing pregnant illegal...If you need to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper